COMMENT - Written by Rick Conroy on Thursday, December 31, 2009 - 6 Comments
Work in progress
Briefing session with provincial officials reveals gaps in Green Energy Act
It was an astonishing set of revelations. Perhaps most illuminating was an answer to Councillor Monica Alyea, who wanted to know why wind turbine setbacks were being measured from homes rather than lot lines. In response the Ministry of Environment’s Doris Dumais admitted that “the program was put together quickly this summer. We still have work to do.”
It is discomforting news for County residents who will likely see the first wind turbines erected in the County early next year.
Dumais, along with officials from the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure and Hydro One, were in Prince Edward County to explain the province’s new Green Energy Act to councillors and Mayor Leo Finnegan last Wednesday.
Alyea and others are concerned that the wind turbine setbacks (set at 550 metres) ought to be marked from the property line of their neighbour’s land. But instead the GEA says setbacks will be measured from the receptor (homes or offices).
Alyea says the GEA imposes an unfair and unjust burden on non-participating homeowners. She said an easy solution, establishing setbacks from property limits, would fix the problems she foresees cropping up between neighbours.
Councillor Peter Mertens raised the issue of health concerns related to wind turbines. Councillor Bev Campbell worried about the impact of wind turbines on the County’s tourism economy.
Dumais acknowledged that implementing the GEA is “still a learning process” and that “there is more work to be done.”
Yet the province is ploughing ahead with its ambition to dot the rural and vacationland horizon with 40-storey wind turbines. But Dumais wasn’t finished. She admitted, in an answer to another question from Alyea, that the province would not compel developers to set aside reserves or purchase a bond to decommission (deconstruct and remove) its wind turbines at the end their life cycle.
Dumais suggested there was enough residual value left in the massive towers that it is unnecessary to burden developers with this cost.
“No financial insurance is required,” Dumais told council members. “They need to provide us with a decommissioning plan before the project is approved.”
This prompted Mayor Leo Finnegan to ask, “What if the company goes bankrupt and walks away?”
Dumais assured the Mayor that it was the Ministry’s view that abandoned wind turbines would have sufficient residual value to enable landowners to trade for the removal of machinery from their land even if the developer walked away.
Council had requested representatives from the Department of National Defence to speak to council, but their request was declined.
In response to a question about CFB Trenton and Mountain View airfield from Councillor Keith MacDonald, Dumais said the GEA provides no specific policy or guidelines.
“We work with them on a case-by-case basis,” said Dumais. “We have no jurisdiction— military and commercial flightpaths fall under federal jurisdiction.”
Jim Beal of the province’s Ministry of Natural Resources noted for council, however, that Gilead’s Ostrander Point project had been approved by Department of National Defence officials.
Gilead intends to begin construction of 12 turbines on crown land in South Marysburgh next year. MPP Leona Dombrowsky addressed council on Tuesday evening regarding the GEA.
She defended the Green Energy Act saying it would stimulate Ontario’s economy and allow it to close the province’s remaining coal plants.
She hinted that had the GEA been in effect two years ago, the health and safety concerns arising in some communities that have seen wind energy projects develop around them may have been avoided.
“Those sites were built without the benefit of the regulations of the Green Energy Act,” said Dombrowksy. “Our setbacks of 550 metres is the highest standard in Canada, the U.S. and eight European countries.”
Dombrowsky said the GEA strikes a balance between the need to move away from a carbon-based economy with the health, safety and economic challenges related to renewable energy.
The final arbiter of disputes will be the Renewable Energy Tribunal—composed of independent, third party experts.
Councillor Ray Best asked Dombrowsky what happens when the wind stops.
“Wind will never be part of the base load power supply,” said Dombrowsky. “But it will allow us to replace high carbon electricity.”
Meanwhile, back at the working session with ministry officials, the true role of the GEA was revealed as Councillor Dianne O’Brien attempted to understand the streamlined development process that was created to provide a “single window” access to developers.
“At what point does the municipality make its decision about a project?’ asked O’Brien.
The MOE’s Doris Dumais corrected the councillor. “There is no municipal decision,” said the provincial official.
“Municipalities must simply sign off that they were consulted.”
6 Comments
Gil Charlebois
Matthew Wood
The Times is the most biased paper in the history of Journalism! Cut the crap Rick, what health concerns? Are people in just about every country in the world being deafened by Turbines. Is tourism up in the County because people have stopped going to Countries that have embarrassed change for the better. No they still visit Germany, Spain, France and the UK. And believe it or not they will still come when there are turbines built. I wouldn’t be surprised if tourism actually improves, the beaches will still be there, the wineries will still produce great wine and the farmers will have another way of using their land to produce something beneficial to the community.
Rick stop being “Chicken Little”. I dare you to put this comment in your paper unedited. Believe it or not other peoples opinions are just as important as yours.
Jefferson Gilbert of Cressy
With regards to the ‘dare’ from Mr Wood. Regardless of the view you have of the windmill issue and the health issues, or any issue for that matter, has Mr Wood lost sight of the fact that ‘he who owns the press’ has the right to express his opinion in said press. Those of us who do not own newspapers, let alone quality ones like the WT, must then select which press we wish to get the perspective from. Some like left, some right, some from independents and some from conglomerations, some local, some national and some international. Our choices. Those that own newspapers, on occasion make space available, in print and on-line, to those of us who do not own newspapers, to express a view or an opinion. However, those comments need to be accurate and add value to the other readership. That again lies with ‘he who owns the press’ and not he who dares, or even ‘double-dares’ – per Grade 6. I think too often we are reading the opinions, in the local papers of PEC, that are inconsistent with the perspective of the paper. So Mr Wood, perhaps if your opinion is so important, you can purchase or start a newspaper, and in a few years we will become loyal followers of your newspaper because I am sure you are prepared to dedicate yourself to the community and the support there of, not to mention the catalyst for healthy high-level debate, that the folks at the WT have offered over the last few years.
Lena
To Matthew Wood – Did you mean countries embarrassed BY change? or countries embarrassed TO change? Whatever you meant to say, it is you who should be embarrassed!
You think The Wellington Times is the most biased paper. You probably believe everything you see on TV or read on the internet. Can I hazard a guess that your favourite news channel is FOX or CNN?
No wonder you have swallowed the line about health concerns that are voiced by the Wind Turbine Companies and their provincial lackeys. You probably believed the big tobacco companies who told us there was no proof that smoking caused lung cancer. They had the research to “prove” cigarettes were safe because they paid for that research to reach those conclusions. Just like the chemical companies that make pesticides that cause breast cancer and then fund the large campaigns to “cure” cancer. They want the focus off of prevention because they know that their chemicals are to blame, And this way they can have huge ad campaigns telling us how they are good corporate citizens and then turn an even greater profit by making more chemicals/drugs used to treat cancer.
Do you also believe every commercial you see on TV and all their claims? Perhaps you could learn to express you opinion with facts to back your position. The only opinions that are worth hearing (or as important as others) are ones that have facts to back them up.
Your “crap” is due to the lack of putting the brain into gear before the brakes came off the mouth (or typing fingers).
Matthew Wood
Ha ha lena. You think your opinions have facts to back them up. Your off your rocker.
I’d be the last person to believe a chemical company or a tobacco company. My mother was a dedicated smoker and said that it would never kill her. I watched the woman I love die a painful death hopped up on Morphine. And I don’t think that the vanity of seeing a beautiful lawn justifies the poisoning of the environment.
Sister why are you pulling a splinter out of my eye when there is a rafter in yours.
Matthew Wood
My appoligies Lena the day I wrote the reply I wasn’t myself. Thank you for pointing out my spelling mistake. Yes it should have been embraced, it’s only Prince Edward County that doesn’t want to be part of a newer cleaner world. And it really isn’t the county it’s just the minority that isn’t in favour of it. Those people who have polluted their portion of Ontario and retired to a simpler life amongst the friendliest people in Canada. Lena why don’t you educate yourself and have a look at the site at the end of this comment. I could give you more if you were even remotely open minded.
The people here in the County are quietly humble but if they are reading this I urge them to step up and make their voices heard! Don’t let the part timers dictate what happens in our County. Go to the town hall meetings, talk to your friends, neighbors and family and even the tourist on the street. Tell them how you feel and what legacy you want to leave your children. Become a part of history you will be proud of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_effects_of_wind_power
Leave a Reply
Popular Posts
Fatal error: Call to undefined method WP_Error::get_item_quantity() in /home/newsroo1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/easy-popular-posts/easy-popular-posts.php on line 210


I witnessed this smoke and mirrors presentation to PEC by Queen’s Park and I thought it was a JOKE.
Not one question were answered without the phrase” it’s a learning process!!”My god the health,safety and well being of all Ontario is at stake and that’s the Best McQuinty and Company can come up with!! Oh !! Let’s push the GEA through the system(in 30 days) because “George ” wants us to and THEN we’ll fix all the health,safety issues that arise by stating, “it’s a learning process.” Sorry, we believed all the “Wind Industry provided data” as gospel. Forget the latest revelations from all over Europe that Turbines aren’t the answer.
I can hardly wait for the next election date to get rid of this Ontario Dictatorship.
My sympathy to Toronto if George runs and wins.