Columnists
The good karma year
I went to my optalmologist for a test last week and came out holding an appointment card for my next visit—in January, 2020. Yes, my eyes finally opened to the fact that a big bus stop year is almost upon us.
The next big bus stop after 2020 will be at 2050—if we make it that far. The last big bus stop was 2000—if we can remember that far back.
There is a lot of good karma associated with next year. You know, “20/20 vision is the optimal vision, so let’s make this coming year as a year in which we think clearly about the future.” And “Hindsight is 20/20, so let’s make the year of reflection and ask ourselves how we can collectively learn from our mistakes.”
Hilarity will be found looking back at predictions for 2020 that were way off the mark — the kind that said that by now we’d all be floating in our individual space bubbles, tooling off to Mars for the weekend. And there will be no shortage of people jostling to make predictions about what lies ahead; after all, if you make enough predictions, some of them are bound to be right and people will only remember what you got right.
Actually, I kind of like the idea of promoting 2020 as a year of reflection. A ‘taking stock’ year in which we look both forwards and backwards— as long as it’s coupled with an effort to come out of it with some sort of planetary, national, regional, local, family or personal game plan. There is a difference between thinking that the future is something that just happens to us as a product of our past; and seeing it as something that we have a hand in determining. If we have a game plan, we just might come closer to achieving that future than if we simply let it be.
Most effective organizations have a game plan that is a product of time out from regular business and considered thought. They consider that you can only develop a good game plan after you have a clear idea what game you’re playing, why you are playing it, what environment you’re playing in, who you’re playing against, and what your own strengths and weaknesses are.
Another way to ensure the taking stock is meaningful is to make it a civic process. It’s commonly said that we’re divided into tribes that have ceased to talk to one another; civilized discourse has become something you can only have with another person who feels the same way as you.The fact that it’s commonly said doesn’t, unfortunately, make it less true. Somewhere along the way, we also became distrustful of expertise and lost our respect for facts. I won’t speculate as to which US president is most at fault for that.
A related reason for taking stock in a public way is the opportunity to address disengagement. Increasingly, we don’t answer our questions by thinking for ourselves and discussing them with others: we get them from Google. We become passive and cocooned. We think ourselves powerless. We don’t get involved with our communities, and our communities don’t go out of their way to make engagement easy for us. We must want to engage, and our governments must want to consult us. A collective taking stock process would provide an opportunity to improve the dynamic.
The problems we face—the old ones of poverty, hunger, violence, disease and nuclear annihilation, and the new ones of climate change, mass migration and machine domination—demand a game plan; any one of them bring an existential threat to humanity. What would be wrong with more public discussion of some of these questions? What duty do I owe to my fellow men and women? What resource commitments are needed to make declarations of human rights meaningful? By what standard do we determine to intervene to protect minorities in other countries facing persecution? Should we be compromising our standard of living still further to address inequality and suffering? Is our tax burden too heavy or unfairly spread? Should there be a worldwide wealth tax; and how would government administer it if there were? Is nuclear power the answer, or are the leakage, storage and proliferation risks too daunting? Can we try to control the pace of technological progress, and if so, how and why? Do we really want to live up to our Paris Accord commitments, and if so, are we doing enough to get there? Are we effectively condemning too many to poverty by limiting economic migration? Public discussion of these issues, sharpened down, would be revelatory.
Some people might scoff and say using 2020 as a ‘taking stock’ year will just be a licence for us to goof off and put off dealing with these big problems for another year. Yet our failure to develop a game plan will result in us dealing with crises on an ad hoc basis. Worse still, it may lead to more autocratic governance as more draconian moves seem to be required. And we can’t develop good game plans without a public taking stock.
So let’s take advantage of that good karma year in 2020. We can’t afford to wait 30 years: we’ll all be weekending on Mars by then.
Comments (0)