Comment

Locals only

Posted: March 31, 2022 at 9:26 am   /   by   /   comments (6)

We know it’s wrong. We know that discriminating against our fellow humans is a failing—likely rooted in our primitive evolutionary wiring. We know that it is unfair, unjust, and destructive to our social well-being—that it runs counter to our fundamental ideas of a civilized society. We know, too, that generalizing about someone based on age, gender, race, marital status etc., is simply bad information. We know it is profoundly worse when prejudice and bias become institutionalized— when discrimination is crystallized into law. And when governments enforce and uphold prejudicial laws—when it becomes the organ of discrimination. We know it’s wrong, yet we can’t seem to break the habit.

Last week a committee of council took another step toward formalizing the distinction between us and them. Residents and tourists. One set of laws for those who live here, a different more punitive set of laws for visitors to this community.

While Shire Hall has not yet worked out how we will project our identity as residents— ID card, vehicle sticker, secret handshake, smug look of self-satisfaction—we are well on our way to establishing a category of laws for tourists and a different set for residents.

Where it begins is on Huyck’s Point, Bakker and North Beach Roads. On some warm summer days—mainly when Sandbanks beach is full—the parking lot at North Beach Provincial Park fills up, and the parking spills down both sides of County Road 27 (North Beach Road). It was particularly bad in 2019 (an anomalous year that now serves as the benchmark for this and a growing list of other municipal overreactions.)

There were other solutions (there always are)—including urging Park officials to create more parking at North Beach. Instead, the County responded last year by erecting signs banning parking on all the roads leading to Lake Ontario in Hillier. Walloping $300 fines—$400 if you don’t pay up right away.

Folks who had used this water access for decades—to walk their dog or spend a quiet few hours on the beach—were suddenly caught up in the municipal frenzy to beat back the tourist horde. One Wellington family received two massive fines for an overly long walk on the beach.

This year, the laws and the fines will remain. But only tourists will be charged. That’s the plan. County residents will be exempt from the law. One law for us, another for them.

Instinctively some councillors sensed this might be a bad idea. Hillier and Wellington councillors Ernie Margetson and Mike Harper expressed some wariness. Hallowell councillor Brad Nieman said the fines were too steep.

But others see the dawning of a new golden age— one in which the privilege of residency might be dispensed, and benefits offered to residents only.

“So that every taxpayer has some kind of identification that gives them some benefits for being residents,” said Councillor Andreas Bolik.

That our elected officials don’t immediately see this as the repulsive and ugly discrimination it is, is because they think they know who tourists are. Thoughtless, insensitive mass of garbage strewers, who don’t respect private property and wear inappropriate garb to the grocery store.

But like every other stereotype, it is bad information. It tells us nothing at all reliable about the individual. Worse, it is dehumanizing.

There are certainly challenges associated with the tourism economy. But smart and civilized folks can figure out how to mitigate these challenges and moderate the impact of this economic activity in ways that don’t establish two classes of humans— us and them.

rick@wellingtontimes.ca

Comments (6)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • April 3, 2022 at 3:39 pm Ben Corke

    They could knock down the Tambo and build a 26 story parking garage. Buses buses buses. The more buses we have on the county roads the better will be the county life.

    Reply
  • April 2, 2022 at 6:28 pm Dan

    Good question Debbie, wish I had the answer. Maybe senior staff or council can explain. You own two properties, pay your taxes, but do not live here full time.
    Their view seems to be, unless you rent your properties long term to tenants.
    You are considered a greedy STA operator, or real-estate investor just looking for a quick buck, with no concern for the community. And you created the affordable housing crisis.
    If I live in Ottawa, does this give me more privilege’s or special pass, to visit Parliament Hill ?
    The absurdity , it’s embarrassing to the County.
    Council forged over time, this division, and continue to fuel it.

    Reply
  • April 2, 2022 at 4:08 pm Debbie Marshall

    I would like to know if the County Council consider me a local or not. I was born and raised in the County. I left at 18 to attend college and find work in my profession. I have since returned to my home town in that I own two cottages in the County and intend to build a permanent residence on one property when I retire in 3 years. Does this mean I’m any less County than the people I’ve known all my life? I spend 6 months of the year at my cottage and almost all my time off over the last 32 years. My family all still reside here and say I’m still a local. What’s your opinion? Am I County enough to be considered a Local?

    Reply
  • March 31, 2022 at 6:57 pm Dan

    This council has spent 3 years demonizing Sta’s. Now they are directly targeting visitors once again.
    Obviously , smack in the face, clear discrimination to our visitors. Any program where locals get preference on public roads and visitors may be fined. Eventually they will stop coming, and take their tourist dollars somewhere they feel welcome. ( And who could blame them). Also has capability to inflict immediate, consequential damage, if picked up on social media.
    Just , continuation of the assault on the tourism industry in PEC. Shortsighted , with long term consequences. Potential causing business’s to shutter, employment opportunities disappear. Grocery stores, hardware stores, supply stores , your favorite restaurant, will not be immune.
    Recent decisions from council lack good common sense, medaling in area’s , they have no qualifications.
    County residents would be better served if our elected officials focus on taxes, roads, water rates and severances. No one elected you , to reimagine tourism.

    Reply
  • March 31, 2022 at 2:02 pm Mike

    Our council is simply out of good ideas…. and thus have resorted to their primal roots. This coupled with an aversion for complex solutions means they consistently land on the shortest, most divisive quick fix that comes to mind.

    The outcome means we are killing our primary employer (tourism) with no substitute in sight. Does anyone remember the last time we attracted an employer to the County that wasn’t tourist oriented?

    If you do, please share, for this council appears to only be a no-trick pony.

    Reply
    • April 1, 2022 at 8:40 am Jeff

      The last time we had an employer should interest was Picton Terminals. They were interested in many different fronts for PEC including great lake tourism.

      However since we as a community are so concerned about change we turned them away and our neighbors Kingston took them in with open arms.

      The municipality of Kingston has officials and a council that can actually stop bickering and make decisions good for their community.

      It seems here all we want to do is complaint about the past issues that are here, protect everything that might be developed so the people that retire here can have what they think is a perfect life and push for the workers to live pay to pay for their lofty commitment ideas.

      When will the county staff and council realize this county is by far more than tourism and the moving in residents that didn’t do their research on the area first and now want to change things to their wants.

      Reply