Comment

Decade of excess

Posted: Oct 2, 2025 at 10:52 am   /   by   /   comments (6)

Shire Hall tends to go through phases in which it forgets what it is. Who it serves. Where it exists on a map. It uses terms like “sustainable finances” and “affordability” as if it knows what the words mean. Yet Shire Hall repeatedly demonstrates that it doesn’t know—or doesn’t care—that it is part of the problem.

Shire Hall sees its primary purpose as growing Shire Hall. Bigger for its own sake. The larger the beast becomes, the more it must be fed. The wider its waistline expands, the hungrier it gets.
Where local government once existed to serve its residents, the roles have now been flipped. It is now the job of residents to keep Shire Hall fed and contented. But we are failing to keep up. The cost is growing exponentially. Shire Hall is growing faster than our ability to shovel tax dollars into its maw. Something has to change.

To illustrate my argument, I am leaning this week on two measures: salaries and wages and contracted services. I rather dislike using these line items as they tend to represent humans who live in our community. However, local government is primarily about delivering services, so it is an unavoidable gauge of how bulky Shire Hall has become—a flashing red signal warning of the trouble we are in.

To illustrate my argument, I am leaning this week on two measures: salaries and wages and contracted services. I rather dislike using these line items as they tend to represent humans who live in our community. However, local government is primarily about delivering services, so it is an unavoidable gauge of how bulky Shire Hall has become—a flashing red signal warning of the trouble we are in.

Simply put, there is no reason to believe the next census will show anything other than flat to marginal population growth in 2026. Bear this in mind because, again, local government is meant to serve its population. Not the other way around.

In 2015, Shire Hall spent $19.3 million on salaries, wages and benefits. Last year, it spent nearly $35 million. That is an 80 per cent increase over a decade. Take a moment.

But inflation. Surely the cost of living drove similar increases across the economy? Nope. The cumulative price increase in Ontario over the same period was 27 per cent. Shire Hall blew past the cost of living by a wide margin. It is still accelerating.

Did the workload expand? Perhaps. But five times more? Serving the same number of residents? It doesn’t add up.

Shire Hall pays well, too. Folks are well compensated. The average total annual income of County residents measured by StatsCan in 2020 was $46,120. Last year, Ontario’s sunshine list showed 46 municipal employees earned more than $100,000 in 2024. As the gap widens, it is harder to relate to the folks living on the margins, struggling to get by.

Contracted services include the folks who do things Shire Hall staff won’t or can’t do. They include consultants, snowplow operators and road builders. Shire Hall spent nearly $11 million on such services in 2014. It spent more than $20 million last year—an 84 per cent increase in a decade.

Now, one might expect wages to rise quickly if there were a push to bring contracted jobs in-house. You might also imagine the opposite—contracted services growing as the organization outsources jobs it once handled internally. But when the charts are both spiralling upward, it suggests something is terribly wrong.

It is bloat—dangerous, unchecked, bloat. It won’t end until Shire Hall chooses to change its ways.

I raise this point for two reasons this week. Salaries and wages expenses are likely to be off the charts in 2025. A half dozen senior staff have departed and been replaced at Shire Hall this year. Council has not disclosed the terms nor the cost of these departures, nor the financial impact for future years. It will be a big number. Shire Hall should put these costs on the table and make a clean break with the past decade. It should use 2025 as a watershed.

We are paying the bills for a decade of big ideas. Of grand ambition. Of forgetting what this place was. And who it serves. We are paying the cost, frankly, of poor governance and oversight.

Shire Hall can choose to do the things local government was meant to do. It can admit it can’t do everything. It should stop trying—stop loading up on debt in a useless attempt to do so. There is simply too much geography and too few people. This place will never be Markham, Nepean or Halton.

Shire Hall has the opportunity to change its trajectory. To reject a decade of excess and loathing for the taxpayer. Shire Hall has the opportunity to start anew.

It has a moment here.

rick@wellingtontimes.ca

Comments (6)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • Oct 6, 2025 at 1:17 pm Gary

    An independent Staffing Review is needed immediately! There can be savings had with reductions and realigning responsibilities. The Economic Community Programs is a good place to start.

    Reply
  • Oct 2, 2025 at 2:18 pm Nancy

    I asked many times who are all these people coming? Maybe in 2020 it looked that way but certainly not now. There are 450 homes for sale. The County is not growing. One person on the Council (McNaughton) said well we have to attract more people to come? She could not say how or even what businesses would be enticed to
    Move here.

    Reply
    • Oct 3, 2025 at 8:22 am Anonymous because there are always repercussions

      Nancy, that is, indeed, the right question, and always has been. It should have been the first question that our Mayor and Council should have asked.

      The trouble is, I think that they asked others, and did not actually ask themselves, think critically about available answers, and come to a logical answer. Instead, they asked people like:

      – Developers, who have a vested interest only in getting public money invested to service land that they bought on speculation;

      – Consultants, whose only interest is in getting the most billable hours possible at very high hourly rates;

      – Anyone else that they think would be a useful scapegoat if things don’t work out.

      The County is not growing for the same reasons it has historically not grown.

      1) There are a limited number of jobs in a limited number of industries (agriculture, tourism, hospitality and of course County government)

      2) Those sectors are not growing, and there is no reason to expect that they will grow — there are more logical locations for new businesses to locate, close to the 401 and rail and air transportation.

      What the County has historically offered, is a quiet, high quality life for retirees and the limited number of people who have jobs that sustain their chosen lifestyle.

      Critical thinking would suggest that, regardless of the rhetoric and spin doctoring by the likes of developers, consultants and the many County employees on the Sunshine List, this will remain the status quo.

      Stop the spending, stop the bloat, right size the County government, and stand up for the residents and taxpayers that are here, now, today.

      Reply
      • Oct 6, 2025 at 3:35 pm Teena

        I absolutely agree. Especially with the last paragraph. I’d love to see an initiative for our next Municipal Election for a “Clean Council Campaign”. Eliminate campaign donations. Use some of those expensive Sunshine List salaries we’re paying for, put a portion of the money into a fund for our PEC candidates to divide in equal portions towards their election campaigns, and completely eliminate the campaign donations being offered and accepted by OUR candidates by developers and off-county business interests. Members of council should physically know the individuals who are donating to their campaign, and I strongly suspect that many contributors don’t live here at all. I want a council I can trust and believe in. At least most of the time.

        Reply
  • Oct 2, 2025 at 12:53 pm Teena

    Here’s a little fact check of Shire Hall covering the period 2019 to 2025.

    Number of County employees earning more than $100,000:
    2019 – 19 employees
    2025 – 62 employees

    Number of Directors at Shire Hall:
    2019 – 2 employees
    2025 – 10 employees
    Note: 9 earn over $150,000

    Total salaries:
    2019 – $24.3 million
    2025 – $34.7 million
    Note: 40 per cent increase in 6 years.

    They’re your taxes. Think about it.

    Reply
    • Oct 11, 2025 at 2:48 pm Al Brosseau

      There’s a name for this: “EMPIRE BUILDING” and it’s for self serving organizations, not organization that serve people.
      And all this under the Ferguson administration “oversight”?!??! Talk about being asleep at the wheel.

      Reply