County News
Getting to zero
County staff proposes cuts to budget
Mayor Peter Mertens was elected in large part to put the County’s finances in order. After a decade in which property taxes more than doubled—voters said they wanted change.
Mertens said he would work toward a zero increase in the County’s budget.
But in its first draft, municipal staff tabled what it called a “status quo” budget—maintaining services and infrastructure at the same level as last year—meaning a 9.7 per cent increase in the tax levy (the amount the County collects in property taxes).
Council sent this proposal back—nearly unanimously directing staff to come back with a budget that holds the line on taxes.
Last Thursday, council learned what it will take to lock in a zero per cent increase in its 2011 budget. Senior municipal staff unveiled a list 40 “potential solutions and adjustments” to reduce operating costs, and a handful of capital projects it could put off for another year or two.
If council were to accept each of these recommendations, the budget under staff’s direct control would be flat in 2011. Some of the measures will likely be met with stiff resistance, however.
These include closing the town halls in Wellington, Athol and South Marysburgh, and Benson Hall in Picton, for six months. Money would be cut from specialized transit service, suspending service to the County’s landfill and transfer sites during the winter months except Picton and Wellington.
Some councillors reacted immediately against specific cuts, particularly in their ward.
Sophiasburgh Councillor Kevin Gale told Recreation, Parks and Culture staff they would have to answer to a meeting hall of boating enthusiasts when he saw the department was recommending the deferral of repairs to the boat launch in Northport.
Others did an about-face once they saw the list. Hallowell Councillor Keith McDonald had chided fellow council members earlier in the day that tough choices would have to be made.
“This afternoon we are going to see the men separated from the boys,” challenged McDonald, sailing over the fact that nearly a third of council doesn’t share his gender.
But when the list of recommendations was handed around the table after lunch, McDonald was the first to notice that a $300,000 plan to improve drainage along County Rd. 12 was on the list to be deferred and that road resurfacing would be cut back. He dropped his cost-cutting crusade and became a defender of County roads.
“These are the roads residents travel on every day,” said McDonald. “We’ve got a responsibility to look after our roads.”
But Public Works head Robery McAuley said his department’s recommendations were made in consultation with his staff and would not jeopardize driver safety, nor would the County’s road system suffer markedly.
Merten’s cautioned his fellow council members that if they were going to ask for one of the recommended cuts to be put back into the budget, they had better be prepared to suggest something else of equal value be taken off.
Mertens applauded the work of staff in producing legitimate, workable—though difficult recommendations.
“This buys us time,” said Mertens. “From here we can examine the base and change the way we do business.”
Other councillors, too, were impressed by the quality and thoroughness of the work done by staff to root our savings.
“This is an excellent start,” said Wellington Councillor Jim Dunlop. “We knew holding the line was going to mean a cut in service—they’ve done a good job of giving us the options.”
Council was to have met on Tuesday to decide if it would accept the recommendations. It was not clear whether they would find a consensus in a half-day of deliberation.
I was quite intrigued by the quotes County received from various operators for plowing snow at several county facilities. There was practically no competitive bids, as if the operators had already decided who would bid on which building. They two or three that had more than one bid, varied by 100-150% between them. With all the county trucks running around, can’t we get a few outfitted with plows? It costs us about $1000 every time a hired snowplow operator clears snow at each of the following… the new Wellington arena, the fire route at the Duke Dome, the Community Centre in Picton and I think the Picton Library. Maybe we can save some money by doing it in-house.
One other little detail to factor in to all of this is assessment values. After the MPAC fiasco property values were frozen. Once it was “fixed” assessments were to rise automatically for several years, as I recall, no matter how the actual real estate market was behaving. Brilliant! So, my assessment is up 10 per-cent over last year. I am sure an increased assessment is the case for almost every property owner. Council will have to adjust the mill rate downward to neutralize these assessment increases.
A simple saving: the elimination of the useless Economic Development Department. An immediate $937K+ annual budget line item reduction. No severance packages to staff- just 1 week/year notice per the Employment Standards Act.
Taxes doubled in less than 10 years because of OVERPOPULATION. That can’t be stopped, but it can be slowed. If residents wish to pay less taxes, figure some ways to make the county look less attractive. The upcoming ugly transformation from a wildlife refuge to an ugly industrial park full of bird-chopper wind turbines should help keep wide eyed beauty seeking new people from Toronto from moving in. You could tell potential newcomers they are hated by wind farmers because they were not born in the county, unless they endorse the upcoming ugliness mentioned above.
I believe that over the last 20 years the total population in the county has only grown about 2%. Overpopulation is not the reason for taxes doubling. Since amalgamation twelve years ago, staff has doubled, if not more. If we want to see our taxes decrease, we need to increase our tax base, which is currently about 12,000. Which includes businesses and residences – remember individuals do not pay County taxes.
Good start. How about freezing or reducing salaries? And how about reducing the number of staff in the Recreation and Parks Dep’t where we now have a Commissioner and three Managers? It would be nice to see others in the County come up with cost cutting so.lutions.
I do not understand why the County undertakes roadside brushing and grass cutting. Property owners should be provided with the County’s specific requirements vis a vis grass and bush etc… and be responsible for this themselves. If it isn’t done, a warning should be issued, and, if not followed, then the County can do it and add the cost to the property owner’s property tax bill.
The County owns the road allowance, (anywhere from 66 feet to 96 feet. total width) Why should a farmer for example who may own a mile (or more) of land fronting on a road brush and mow property he doesn’t own? In one instance I am familiar with this would amount to several miles. Would the County fine the land owner in question if the work was not completed by June 30 th every year? Should a farmer stop work
on his farm for several days and tend to the County’s directive while his crops suffer so that people who live in town have lower taxes?
Fair enough, although I note we still pay property tax on the road allowance the County “owns”.