County News

Resistance

Posted: January 6, 2017 at 9:16 am   /   by   /   comments (8)

Still some fight left in Amherst Island residents

They cling fiercely to the last strands of hope. Amherst Island residents opposed to industrial wind development still believe they can stop 29 massive (50 – storey) machines from permanently scarring their pastoral skyline from end to end of this tiny (20-km long) island. They believe they can protect endangered birds, bats and animals from the 25 kilometres of new service roads being carved into the agricultural landscape. They believe they can stop 44,000 truckloads from crossing the narrow passage between Amherst Island and the mainland.

Time, however, is running out. The developer, Windlectric, a unit of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., has its Renewable Energy Approval (REA) in hand. An appeal to an Environmental Review Tribunal failed to stop the project. Opponents will make another appeal to the courts later this month, hoping to convince a judge to send the matter back to the Tribunal to consider new evidence.

Meanwhile, the developer is pushing ahead despite shifting political currents. Amherst Island was, from the outset, an odd place to put an industrial wind project. The island sits across a narrow channel from the Lennox generating plant—with the capacity to power about eight per cent of Ontario’s homes—though it never does. Not even close. In the past five years it has operated less than two per cent of the time. Yet the plant earns Ontario Power Generation $7 million a month just for standing by.

St. Paul’s Presbyterian, Stella Forty Foot Road, Amherst Island.

Despite this vast amount of unused capacity, the province is building a new gas-powered electricity plant right next to the Lennox plant after Mississauga voters persuaded then-Premier Dalton McGuinty to move the partiallybuilt plant out of their community. Combined these two plants will have the capacity to power millions of households—with no reasonable prospect of ever doing so.

With so much electricity generation capability just a few kilometres away, it is clear the decision to build a comparatively puny intermittent electricity generating facility on the adjacent island wasn’t made to satisfy capacity needs. Or an economic rationale. When—or if—completed the Amherst Island wind project will be one of the most expensive such projects undertaken relative to its size—partly due to the cost of building temporary docks and a submarine cable across the channel.

It is the politics of green energy that drives this project. The politics, however, have become murkier in recent months.

In October, Premier Kathleen Wynne cancelled all new procurement of large renewable energy projects. By then Windlectric had already secured a power-purchase contract for its Amherst Island project and received its REA, but had not yet begun construction. Perhaps sensing the window might be closing, Windlectric filed a Notice of Commencement for the Amherst Island project on October 31. It hadn’t yet received every necessary approval from the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC).

But back on Amherst Island, the developer was now grappling with a host municipality unhappy with the company’s Operations Plan and threatening to block the process until it was satisfied the plan was robust enough to protect residents and the Township’s infrastructure.

In late October, Loyalist Township officials wrote to Windlectric complaining the Operations Plan lacked detail and was inadequate to trigger the Road Use Agreement between the developer and the municipality.

Loyalist wrote the developer again in November, once more expressing disappointment at the lack of detail in the plan and that much more information was required so that it could properly evaluate the plan. Still nothing. In early December, the Township withdrew the building permit that would have allowed the construction of the mainland dock—required to service the project—citing a pending decision by MOECC relating to the developer’s Certificate of Property Use.

If the Township had hoped to bring attention the gaps in the Operations Plan, it failed. Instead, the company wrote to say that it was operating in full compliance with the law and that it frowned upon any suggestion otherwise. But yet offered no more detail in its Operations Plan.

Green energy legislation, however, gives renewable energy developers in Ontario a prescribed amount of time before the province gives it the green light—over the municipality’s objections.

By the year end, relations between the Township and the developer were becoming rather tense. Loyalist officials were continuing to press for more detail without response from the developer. On December 20, the Township’s CAO Robert Maddocks wrote again to say that in its opinion, the developer’s silence amounted to a fork in the road for the developer. Either it produced the detailed plan the Township was seeking in order to proceed, or it would stop the clock on the process, thereby bringing the project to a standstill.

“We assume from your silence that Algonquin Power Co. is in agreement with the Township’s position that the initial submission does not meet the requirements of the Road Use Agreement,” wrote Maddocks. “We reiterate our position that the forty-five day review period was not commenced by the submission of the incomplete preliminary Operations Plan.”

Ariel Bautista is a Senior Project Manager for Algonquin Power and leads the Windlectric project on Amherst Island. He says the company is continuing to work with Loyalist Township.

“The Road Use Agreement with Loyalist Township sets out the requirements for the parties to follow regarding the Operations Plan,” wrote Bautista in an email response to The Times. “In that regard, under the RUA, after obtaining and considering the Township’s comments on the draft Operations Plan, Windlectric submitted an updated Operations Plan to the Township in December 2016. Windlectric continues to work with Loyalist Township to finalize the Operations Plan under the RUA, which will include a town hall meeting.”

Relations on the ground are little better. According to Michelle Le Lay, the developer has handpicked a Community Liaison Committee, all but one of whom has a direct interest in the project. Other residents are permitted to attend the quarterly meetings but prohibited from asking questions or making comments.

“No one else is allowed to participate,” said Le Lay. “It is a total farce. Its insulting.”

Le Lay says the developer is required to hold community liaison meetings, but isn’t told how it should do this. She says the composition of the community liason committee reflects the developer’s view that they don’t have to tell the community anything more than it has already and that it doesn’t need the community’s approval.

“It’s pure arrogance,” said Le Lay.

Bautista denies Le Lay’s assertion.

“Pursuant to the Renewable Energy Approval, the Community Liaison Committee was established,” wrote Bautista. “The CLC consists of 5 members: three are residents from the island and two are employees of Windlectric. The three members from Amherst island are a former APAI president, a landowner participating in the project and a non-participating landowner.”

APAI’s Le Lay is sensing a different attitude at the MOECC. She says the regional officials have become more diligent in ensuring the developer is complying with the conditions of its REA.

Le Lay says the MOECC put the brakes on the project when the company filed a Notice of Commencement in late October.

“After that, the MOECC wrote them a few days later telling them they couldn’t start anything until they had received all their permits,” said Le Lay. “I don’t think the company calculated that the MOECC would become so concerned with compliance.

“Before they (MOECC officials) didn’t want to answer our questions. Now there is a change in the MOECC’s due diligence.

Le Lay also sees yet another hurdle ahead for the developer. While Windlectric has a RUA hammered out in principle with the Township, it has no such arrangement with the County of Lennox and Addington. Given how the material required to build this project will need to cross county roads, this seems to have been an oversight. Getting this agreement may not be a slam dunk for Windlectric. As of January 1, the new warden for the county is Loyalist Township mayor Bill Lowry.

“The county isn’t particularly happy with being overlooked in this process and don’t see a lot of benefits to it,” notes Le Lay. “So they haven’t signed an RUA yet.”

How does Le Lay explain the plight of Amherst Island residents to others?

“It is beyond reason,” says Le Lay. “ How do you explain something that is not explainable? Every aspect of this seems wrong. The wind isn’t particularly good here. The level of difficulty in building it is unbelievable. The cost to build on this island is really expensive—$6 million alone for two temporary docks. A submarine cable to the mainland. No rational person would see this as a good idea.

“It makes no sense financially. It makes no sense environmentally. It makes no sense.”

Comments (8)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • January 7, 2017 at 10:46 am Al Seymour

    Until the Amherst Island situation is presented in the Toronto media and the Premier is embarrassed again, I fear nothing will change. The Islanders battle against Windelectric and the Green Energy Act is totally foreign here in Mississauga and I received the same feedback, from discussing these issues with my friends. It seems that the urban – rural divide is strong. As long as someone else produces green energy, we urbanites are “cool”. Move the protest back to Toronto? Continue the fight – I am with you!

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 10:29 pm Richard Mann

    Here is a “time line” showing the history of Wind Turbine Noise problems, going back as far as 1979. Each entry provides documentation:
    http://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/timeline/latest/embed/index.html?source=0Ak2bgr7C0nhPdGR3S1lEekU3T3p4ZDhUNDdRV2Y2ZkE&font=Bevan-PotanoSans&maptype=toner&lang=en&height=650

    1979 “First complaints received from a dozen families within a 3km radius of turbine”.
    1981 “Wind turbine operation creates enormous sound pressure waves”
    1982 “Closed windows and doors do not protect occupants from LFN”
    1982 “NASA research on human impacts provided to wind industry”
    1985 “Hypothesis for infrasound-induced motion sickness”
    1987 “Wind industry told that dB(A) unsuitable to measure LFN emissions from wind turbines”

    2004 “Wind industry knows noise models inadequate” (from Vestas)

    2011 “Vestas knew that low frequency noise from larger turbines needed greater setbacks”

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 10:28 pm Richard Mann

    The problem is Wind and Solar are not reducing C02 and our government will not admit this costly failure. Ontario’s professional Engineers, those tasked with generation, transmission and billing, have reported the problem. our government continues to build more wind and solar.

    Reference: “Ontario’s Electricity Dilemma – Achieving Low Emissions at Reasonable Electricity Rates”. Ontario Society of Professional Engineers (OSPE). April 2015.
    (Archived at: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.ospe.on.ca/resource/resmgr/DOC_advocacy/2015_Presentation_Elec_Dilem.pdf)

    Page 15 of 23. “Why Will Emissions Double as We Add Wind and Solar Plants ?”

    – Wind and Solar require flexible backup generation.

    – Nuclear is too inflexible to backup renewables without expensive engineering changes to the reactors.

    – Flexible electric storage is too expensive at the moment.

    – Consequently natural gas provides the backup for wind and solar in North America.

    – When you add wind and solar you are actually forced to reduce nuclear generation to make room for more natural gas generation to provide flexible backup.

    – Ontario currently produces electricity at less than 40 grams of CO2 emissions/kWh.

    – Wind and solar with natural gas backup produces electricity at about 200 grams of CO2 emissions/kWh. Therefore adding wind and solar to Ontario’s grid drives CO2 emissions higher. From 2016 to 2032 as Ontario phases out nuclear capacity to make room for wind and solar, CO2 emissions will double (2013 LTEP data).

    – In Ontario, with limited economic hydro and expensive storage, it is mathematically impossible to achieve low CO2 emissions at reasonable electricity prices without nuclear generation.

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 8:47 pm Nicholas Holman

    Well, it must make some sense to some parties, and these would seem to be the Ontario Liberal Party, creators of the Green Energy Act, and Algonquin, the developer. So within the arcane circle of government policies and wind-farm developers, something is making sense: money is to be made from Amherst Island, whether the project is green-positive or in fact a brown project, which I suspect is the truth.

    The cost of this project, social as well as financial, cannot be calculated, but I – as a recent property owner on the island – suspect that’s it’s negative. And why is the MOECC taking increased interest? Perhaps because the residents-in-opposition have managed to expose the MOECC process as little more than the proverbial rubber stamp. I reviewed the Stantec documents on the heritage impact of the project and I found them less than mediocre. In my professional opinion, they were both woefully inadequate and they were wrong in their conclusions. Possibly this has been the case with the majority of such studies, and to have one exposed for its mediocrity would lead to questions about the others, which could prove unfortunate for the governing party. Better for the Liberals to hush thing up and approve the reports, for a case of business as usual. To do otherwise could open a nasty Padora’s box of inappropriate approvals.

    Enough said. Perhaps one day the truth will come out and the taxpayer will, once again, be stuck footing the bill, one way or another; either for active if cost-ineffective turbines, or for turbines that generate money for Algonquin, but little or no electricity for the province.

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 6:22 pm Sherri Lange

    Yes, it makes no sense. But it makes CENTS…and tons of dollars for the developer and a few greedy landowners on Amherst. This is one of the most tragic projects ever. It is hard to read this report, knowing that the consequences will last for a very long time. The turbines will only last 10-15 years, not the 20-25 as the developers espouse. But they will gouge the environment with their toxic presence, likely not be decommissioned, likely left to rot in the sun, still killing birds and bats, long after disconnection. What a complete travesty. Someone needs to put Wynne in jail. Seriously. The developer clearly has a line of communication with the officers of the province, likely up to Wynne herself. How much did WindLectric contribute to the Liberals? How many thousand dollar a plate events did they attend?

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 4:38 pm Hugh Jenney

    Well done, Michelle!
    Hugh Jenney

    Reply
  • January 6, 2017 at 3:41 pm Rick Vanstone

    Great size-up of the issue on Amherst Island.
    The Amherst project is all about flawed policy being bullied onto unwilling residents. Very undemocratic.
    The Province recently admitted it has made “mistakes”; that it has a surplus power supply for the next decade based on plateaued or declining needs.
    The Amherst wind project is unwanted, unnecessary & long overdue. It can be cancelled with no penalty. Cancelling reduces future costs for ratepayers by $500Mln. Sadly this may be insignificant to our provincial government but not to anyone else.
    What else is it then? Why does the province seem so beholding to Algonquin Power that this crazy project hasn’t been cancelled?
    It’s time to call our elected representatives to account before another tragically irreversible mistake is made on the back of the vast majority of Amherst’s residents.
    Please contact the Premier@ontario.ca; Minister of Energy (Thibeault) gthibeault.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org & Minister.moecc@ontario.ca (Mr Murray). Tell them we are mad as……
    If you can spare a few $, please support the Association to Protect Amherst Island at protectamherstisland.ca or Facebook.com/protectamherstisland.
    Sadly, many of you already know it is very expensive to fight our own government!

    Reply
    • January 7, 2017 at 12:29 pm Rakel Jorviksdottir

      The health and safety issues have been ignored: a goose flying into a turbine blade will crack it. 3 outcomes: 1. Dead goose 2. Cracked blade produced sub and supersonic sound which damages human hearing permanently 3. Bits of Turbine blade fly off and kill people. Birds will seek small mammals as food and fly through the blades, getting minced doing so. Snowy owls, eagles etc will therefore fly at low levels, not as denied on oath by Algonquin ‘expert’ who only went by height of Turbine support. Complete rot!

      Reply