Comment
The tide turns
Is the ground shifting below Ontario’s wind turbines? Last week an Ontario judge ruled that Dr. Arlene King, the province’s chief medical officer of health, will have to testify about the known noise and health risks of industrial wind turbines. It was a small but potentially game-changing decision. The province fought hard to prevent this from happening. Now the truth will be known.
Shawn and Trisha Drennan face the looming prospect of 150 massive industrial wind turbines outside the door of their Ashfield Township home near Goderich. One turbine is set to be erected just 650 metres from their home—45 metre (147 feet) blades sweeping 105 (347 feet) overhead. For at least the next 20 years.
The Drennans have taken their fight the Ontario Supreme Court to block the development. In their battle they are taking on the provincial government, as well as a consortium composed of EPCOR, an Alberta-based utility, and Samsung, a large Korean multinational, that has secured preferred access to the province’s wind energy bonanza. Every other wind developer in the province is watching this courtroom very closely.
When Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Liberal government could no longer ignore complaints ranging from sleep disorders, vertigo to ringing in the ears from ordinary folks living near industrial wind turbines, it directed Dr. King to examine the current medical literature.
In some areas of medical investigation a review of the published studies is a useful method of determining risk and uncovering potential problems. But current wind turbine techonology is barely two decades old, constantly evolving and rarely are these massive machines put as near to residences as they are in Ontario. There is scant literature to study.
In any event it wasn’t what physicians and advocates for these afflicted people were seeking. Folks like Dr. Robert McMurtry have long challenged the province to examine the effect wind turbines have on Ontario residents. There are now more than 600 turbines spinning over homes across the province. There are plenty of folks complaining that wind turbines are making them sick. They say the health of Ontarians living near turbines needs to be investigated— not the thin volume of evidence compiled to date.
Health Canada last week said it would do just that.
Not surprisingly, Ontario’s chief medical officer found “no direct causal link” in the studies she examined. Far less reported however, was that King noted gaps in her report.
Since then, the province has leaned heavily on Dr. King’s report, as it forged ahead with the development of hundreds of wind turbines across the province. Using Dr. King’s report, McGuinty rejected complaints that wind turbines were making people sick as a form of NIMBYism.
It is the gaps, however, that the Drennans and many other Ontarians wish to probe.
Provincial lawyers intervened in an attempt to prevent the province’s top medical officer from testifying in the Drennans’ case. But Justice Mary Sanderson set aside a lower court’s ruling. She, too, wants the chief medical officer to explain the gaps.
Last fall a Environmental Review Tribunal in Chatham Kent, while ruling in favour of the province and the developer, observed that the science behind the current research into health and wind turbines was limited and more work must be done before it could be concluded that these devices are safe and that the setbacks defined in the Green Energy Act are sufficient.
Taken together the province’s own legal and regulatory apparatus, (as well as its own auditor general) have begun to push back against Dalton McGuinty’s rash and ill-considered adventure into intermittent energy generation. In and of themselves, these new hurdles are unlikely to stop McGuinty.
But the mood in Ontario is shifting. Those complaining that industrial wind turbines are making them sick and forcing them from their homes are no longer on the margins. Their numbers are growing. Their voices are becoming louder.
The glow that folks once felt in supporting renewable energy is wearing thin once they learn that generating really expensive, poor quality electricity is ruining their neighbours’ lives.
As the folks in Mississauga opposed to the construction of a gas-fired generating station in their community learned during the last election, when it comes to winning elections Dalton McGuinty will abandon his energy ideas in a heartbeat. When he finally sniffs the tide of public sentiment flowing against industrial wind turbine development in this province, I expect he will fold like a carnival tent in a prairie wind storm.
The only questions left are: How many lives will be diminished in the meantime? How many homes will be made unlivable? How many species will be pushed out of their dwindling habitat? How many horizons will be polluted? How many billions of dollars will this disastrous misadventure cost Ontario taxpayers?
Let us push to finish this—sooner rather than later.
rick@wellingtontimes.ca
What an idea comes to mind – we have so many people involved in the anti-turbine campaign — it’s time to boycott selected corporations en masse!
Let’s boycott an insurance company that invests in wind turbines.
And let’s go after any corporation that does this. Let’s knock some heads for once!
McGuinty will ..NEVER.. admit his fraudulent energy scheme is ..WRONG.!!
HE will resign and retire from government…
With a fat outrageous pension, and a couple of seats on some corporate boards.
He and his family will be well taken care of (financially) far into the future..!!!
Thats the Liberal way.
Even the apolitical folk I know, myself included, recognize McGuinty for the Lame Duck he has become… crippled by the very Industrial Wind Turbines – Fowl Cuisinart’s, that he holds so dear to his ideology… his absurd behavior in this regard is also taking down many other of his “green” birds of a feather.
This article highlights the fact that we seem to be spinning our blades and going nowhere fast. I’ll attempt to explain this premise with the following musing: Every once in a waxing moon faze, I entertain the inherent masochistic nature of my human psyche and watch something on television. I have found that in moderate doses my disdain for this activity actually stimulates healthy, in the preventative sense, thoughts, much like a cup of coffee, a glass of wine, or a cold beer on a hot day. So I watched the Olympic women’s bicycle road competition, one of the most ultimate politically correct, civilized jingoistic expressions that mankind has yet contrived. Interspersed in this coverage were the inevitable sponsorship commercials. One of these, an ad for insurance coverage, emphasized the fear based scenarios of providing for a more secure world for “my children and grandchildren”, free of any financial encumbrances I may have created prior to my death… perhaps so that they might still love and respect (remember) me, hopefully at least so long as I’m still decaying flesh or ash dust in a container. I often wonder whether knowing that I’ve left them a few extra insurance bucks to get by will make my own denial of death any easier. All the while, the very Insurance company offering me this privilege, is investing premiums in Industrial Wind Turbine developments, a folly which I consider more destructive to life here on earth, hence my children and grandchildren, than any monetary encumbrance I might leave them. Using a technology based solution, which is demonstrably limited to a short life span and is dependent upon the very fossil fuels it purports to replace, for its existence, is an apparent but seemingly ignored absurdity. I sometimes think it would be better if I were put out of the misery in which this Insurance company envisions that I live and which they are helping to create, by being fatally bashed on the head with an iron, instead of being tortured to death with irony. What makes this commercial even more personal and ironic, is that the actor who represents this Insurance company and expounds their virtue, was my next door neighbor for over a decade when I lived in Toronto. I saw his face and heard his voice more times in the space of two hours of TV viewing than I did in several months while we lived less than 20 feet apart. I’d rather have the “assurance” that the natural beauty which I have come to perceive will still be here for future generations rather than “insuring” its demise.
David Norman, Rogue Primate of Bloomfield