County News
Those who would be Premier
The candidates on the Ostrander Point decision
Ontario’s Premier Dalton McGuinty, set the wheels in motion that will see the development of nine industrial wind turbines on pristine Crown Land at Ostrander Point. He will be gone as leader, however, before the first turbine is erected. Seven former cabinet ministers in his government are campaigning to replace him. One of them will become Premier at the end of January.
The Times asked each of the candidates to comment on the decision to approve the Ostrander Point wind turbine project. Would they have made the same decision? Are they satisfied with the way energy has been managed; and what would they do differently?
Just three of the candidates responded to the Times’ questions—Kathleen Wynne, Sandra Pupatello and Charles Sousa.
MORE INPUT REQUIRED
Wynne is the MPP for Don Valley West and has headed the provincial ministries of Education, Transportation and, most recently, Municipal Affairs and Housing and Aboriginal Affairs.
Wynne says municipal leaders must play a greater role in the development of renewable power in their communities.
“There needs to be more input,” said Wynne to the Times. “The ‘willing host’ notion is very important—but has to be balanced with the provincial energy needs. We need to step back and look at projects moving forward.”
BETTER PLANNING NEEDED
Charles Sousa is MPP for Mississauga South, the riding made famous for Dalton McGuinty’s decision to move a controversial natural gas power plant—already partly constructed— to Lambton in southwestern Ontario.
“I have personal experience in dealing with energy projects that were poorly planned and didn’t take local input into account right off the bat,” wrote Sousa in response to the Times’ questions. “That’s why my energy policy will centre on better planning, improving the way we generate and use green energy, and encourage local input.”
SMARTLY BALANCED
Sandra Pupatello—longtime MPP for Windsor West—has served as minister in Dalton McGuinty’s government in portfolios of Education, Social and Community Services, and Economic Development and Trade.
Pupatello sidestepped concerns about Ostrander Point, instead pointing to what she perceives as the success of McGuinty’s energy initiatives.
“The Green Energy Act was critical in putting Ontario on the world map as a thought and action leader in Renewable Energy,” wrote Pupatello in response to the Times’ questions. “Our commitment to phase out coal-fired energy generation was smartly balanced with our commitment to replace it with sustainable, renewable, clean sources of energy. As a result, the province secured some globally significant and lasting investments in manufacturing and new generation.”
Kathleen Wynne is uneasy about the quality of information fuelling the renewable energy debate.
“Where is the evidence and science in making these decisions?” asks Wynne. “I’m not sure there are conclusive arguments on either side of these issues—whether it’s health issues or environmental issues. I want to make sure we are operating on the best evidence possible.”
Wynne is aware her party has work to do to mend fences in some parts of Ontario.
“Wherever there is disillusionment with the process—we all have a problem. I have felt that, to a certain extent in rural and northern Ontario. It is one of the reasons that I have made it my business to travel the province and get to know people. I have good working relationships around the province— and that is not going to change.”
Charles Sousa saays his party must do a better job of listening.
“We need to listen to local communities,” wrote Sousa. “Communities must have a voice in local energy planning, and decisions by local council must be respected. Consideration must be given to the proximity of surrounding communities and the impact to the local environment when siting wind farms, gas plants and other generators.”
But Pupatello suggests Ontario must look outward— to get better value for its renewable energy investment
“Future revisions of the FIT Program need to focus on best global practices in procurement,” said Pupatello, “with specific attention on getting the best prices as well as planning for matching generation contracts with local needs and preferences. The costs of generating electricity from renewables will improve dramatically in the next few years—Ontario needs to ensure that it is positioned to take advantage of efficiencies we helped to create with our leadership in energy programming.”
Liberal leadership candidates Glen Murray, Gerard Kennedy, Harider Takhar and Eric Hoskins declined to comment on the Ostrander Point wind development despite several requests by the Times.
Almost no ability to admit mistakes. Almost no clear change in direction from these people. Suggests to me they are still defending the interests of the big corporate players in wind development in On.
Whether its Wynn or Pupatello that becomes leader, they will have a huge amount of money behind them due to the vast public monies the gaming and renewable industry stands to access with their GEA and Gaming Modernization plan. I lament for Ontario’s future.
I have a question for anyone supporting the GEA. We are set to close the last 2 coal plants at the end of 2013. McGuinty has always proclaimed that his goal was to replace the coal plants with renewables.
Well? If that goal has now been met, why do we need any more wind turbines in Ontario?
Anyone got an answer for that one?
Kathleen Wynne said she was against the Ostrander Point wind project in a meeting a bunch of us had with her near Binbrook. Sandra Pupatello is a McGuinty clone. She has said she won’t recall the legislature until she has a seat. It looks like the new Liberal leaser will either be Sousa or Wynne.
I guess Puppethead can’t remember Windtronics and two other “so-called” green manucfacturers that left with million of our tax $$ in less than 2 yrs from the Windsor landscape. Where are those jobs Sandy??? She also doesn’t seem to understand that coal is being replaced by NG not wind & solar which is providing at best 3% of Ontario energy needs and the majority of the time 0% when the wind doesn’t blow or sun shines. Coal during the nuclear refurbishement provided Ontario 25% of it’s electrical needs. Wind & solar are intermittent, unreliable, non-dispatchable, inefficient which require 95% backup from fossil fuels generation. Wake up! Ontario. We are being scammed!!
Could they be any more predictable an d non-committal?