Columnists

Time to pay up

Posted: November 21, 2019 at 2:38 pm   /   by   /   comments (3)

Last week, council was tasked with deciding whether to give itself a ‘raise’. I use the word raise lightly, because an inflation index adjustment is not really a raise. It takes into consideration changes in the price level of a weighted average market basket of consumer goods and services. This means that technically, it’s only enough to keep a councillor’s pay from becoming worth less.

County staff presented a report recommending an update to their 2020 remuneration in accordance with the Councillor Remuneration Adjustment Policy. According to the report, each councillor’s pay would increase by $467 a year and the mayor would see an extra $934 in his bank account. The entire increase for all of council is roughly $7,000 per year.

Council members currently make less than $25,000 per year. This means a councillor who spends 35 hours per week attending meetings, flipping through hundreds of pages of reports and responding to resident concerns will ultimately be earning less than minimum wage. And to be honest, a 35-hour week is likely light on the time needed to do the job properly.

The result is a council being comprised of mostly retirees or self-employed individuals. The amount paid for this job effectively narrows the field to those with time to kill and a pension income. And these folks are in charge of tackling some big issues and to govern a complex $80 million business.

Before the election, councillor Kate MacNaughton hosted seminars geared toward attracting a younger demographic to the horseshoe. She was trying to enhance diversity in government at the municipal level. The prime barrier for those who were passionate about the community and wanted to run for council was the fact that they can’t afford to take that much time away from not only their lives, but their incomes.

Many will be quick criticize the pay raise, especially since this council started down a path of finding a way to save 10 per cent in efficiencies. But the two aren’t related. This exercise is meant to find ways to better run the day-to-day business. Operational changes and structural changes. Not cutting wages and salaries.

It’s time to pay up and compensate properly for the council positions. And not just a cost of living increase. A decent salary that will attract a younger and more diverse demographic to sit around the horseshoe. Folks in the midst of their career—able to give four years to their community without going broke in the process. Unfortunately, with the status quo, the look of the horseshoe will remain much the same.

corey@wellingtontimes.ca

Comments (3)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • November 24, 2019 at 6:14 am Andre

    First off, those salaries are in my opinion unacceptable to attract the quality of people that are needed on council. Two, the issue of diversity is def. an issue and needs to be addressed. Lastly, providing a more reasonable compensation, should be aligned with specific objectives that need to be met and that are communicated publicly prior to any election. Example- “Develop a strong strategic plan and vision for the County that will enable it to attract and retain a strong full time community base”. More of course could be added to this, but there job should not be limited to simply “processing paperwork”…..Senior Administrators for the region who are making in th e180K range should be doing this work.

    Reply
  • November 22, 2019 at 8:57 am KB

    Totally agree. We need people dedicated to these important jobs, and not having to work three other jobs at the same time to make ends meet.

    Reply
  • November 21, 2019 at 3:00 pm Tabitha

    Well written Corey!

    Reply