Comment
Wizard of Ontario
It was crass and ugly political theatre. It could not have been more bald. Two days before the leaders’ debate in advance of the last Ontario election, three Liberal MPPs—Laurel Broten, Charles Sousa and Donna Cansfield—stood on a stage, their arms raised in triumph. All three were running in ridings around Mississauga amidst a debate about a gas-fired electricity generating facility rising out of the ground in the Sherway Gardens area. All three were thought to be at risk of losing their seat because of the plant. A year earlier neighbouring MPP Kevin Flynn had persuaded Dalton McGuinty his seat wasn’t safe unless the Premier killed a much larger gas-generating facility in Oakville. The Mississauga MPPs needed a similar favour. No matter the cost. Faced with losing power over his management of the energy file, McGuinty folded his convictions and opened up the taxpayers’ wallet to appease his desperate MPPs. Now the costs are beginning to be tallied.
Earlier this summer Finance Minister Dwight Duncan admitted that moving the Mississauga plant to Lambton near Sarnia would cost taxpayers at least $190 million. This week beleaguered Energy Minister Chris Bentley said his government would relocate the cancelled Oakville gas-fired generating plant to Lennox Generating Station at Bath—just across the bay from Cressy. The cost of the move: $40 million.
The total price tag for protecting those four Greater Toronto seats: $230 million. Not only do rural Ontarians get to shoulder a goodly share of this fiasco—they also get the gas plants and their emissions the GTA refused to take.
None of this makes sense other than through the lens of craven politics.
First, one of the important rules about generating electricity is to do it as close as possible to the folks who use it. This is because electricity leaks. The farther it has to travel to be consumed, the more it leaks from the grid. It can’t be helped when electricity is generated from dams in Northern Quebec, but such is the tradeoff for that form of inexpensive and emission-free electricity.
The market for the electricity to be generated at the new plant at Bath is the Greater Toronto Area. Same thing for the new Lambton plant. That is why these plants were planned—and in the case of the Mississauga plant, partly constructed—near Toronto; adjacent to the consumers who would use the power.
The fact is these newly relocated plants will have to run harder and spew emissions far longer simply to deliver the same amount of power to Toronto. Therefore the costs of this cowardly waste of taxpayer dollars only begins at $230 million—it rises with every electron generated thereafter.
There is another, perhaps more worrying aspect to be considered. Gas-fired electricity plants are the silent alter ego to wind and solar electricity generation. Because wind and solar are intermittent generating sources that cannot be switched on or off, let alone adjusted to meet fluctuating demand across the province. Gas plants work in the background, masking the variability and unpredictability of wind and solar.
Grid operators must ride them up and down all day long in this masquerade—serving the illusion that wind and solar are actually contributing meaningful amounts of electricity. Meanwhile the gas plants spit out far more emissions than if they were simply turned on and allowed to run at an even output.
What this means locally is that McGuinty and his government will have much more elbow room to pollute the eastern Lake Ontario shoreline with industrial wind turbines and solar farms so that he can boast to the world and GTA voters that he is green. Meanwhile, it will be the gas and oil-generating plant at Bath that actually keeps the lights on. It will be the rural residents downwind that will absorb the emissions.
The cost to this province of McGuinty’s mismanagement of the energy file, in terms of lost opportunity, the flight of manufacturers and processors as well as the enrichment of developers of industrial wind and solar, will eventually be measured in the tens, perhaps hundreds, of billions of dollars.
There was a time Ontario voters may have been fooled by McGuinty’s earnest and ambitious plans for this province’s energy needs. But surely his spineless moves to save seats in the GTA and push his political problems onto rural Ontario have revealed a profound weakness of character.
His ideas were always more puff than substance. More sound bite t han practical reality. More evangelism than science. Now that the veil has been pulled back—Ontarians must re-examine everything McGuinty has ever told them.
rick@wellingtontimes.ca
Ding dong, the witch is dead.
My neighbourhood is slated for demolition by turbine coming soon to West Lincoln. I have a letter from my son’s specialist saying because of his neurological disorder, living 550m from the nearest turbine would be very bad for my sons health. How much proof do we need before we march on Queen’s Park and demand his resignation. He is taking this province down a very bad path. Time to restore democracy to Ontario! Give our communities the right to protect their citizens!
As the closure of both gas plants was purely a political decision and NOT a government decision why is it continually accepted that this will be a tax payer burden – why are we not demanding that the Liberal party pick up this tab?
“Gas plants work in the background, masking the variability and unpredictability of wind and solar.”
*sigh*
Gas plants are riding the variability of nuclear, not renewables. This is trivially easy to demonstrate.
The difference between peak and valley on a daily basis is about 50% in the summer and about 35% in the winter. See here:
http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/marketdata/markettoday.asp
The difference in the height of the line over the day is the variability that we have to fill.
Nuclear accounts for over 50% of the power in Ontario, and that is expected to remain the same for the indefinite future:
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/the-plan
Nuclear’s dispatch is at least three days, and closer to a week. That means that nuclear fills up the line on the ieso page to the predicted load, which can be predicted out about that period of time.
The rest, today about 6GW, has to come from somewhere else. That used to come from coal. We, like everyone else in North America, are shifting our load from coal to gas.
It’s particularly amusing to see Rick make this complaint, because he has in previous articles complained that renewables offer so little energy. Well if they offer so little (and they do), then certainly we wouldn’t need all these gas plants, would we. Sorry Rick, I’m going to have to point out this obvious hypocrisy.
But let’s ignore facts, they’re boring. I mean, it’s not like my child’s future depends on a reasoned and informed debate… let’s just look at the color of the campaign signs of whomever’s in office and let that inform us of everything we need to know. That’s a good idea, for sure.
More and more I keep wondering just what PRINCIPLES/STANDARDS of Journalism Rick works by. Journalists keep telling me that their STANDARDS of JOURNALISM don’t allow them to be biased.
Wow. There might have to be a Dirty Business book II to get fantastic stuff like this out there! Bravo, Rick!
Dalton-the-Destroyer will not be satisfied until he has made sure that this province is completely annihilated. Not sure what Ontario ever did to him, but it’s quite clear that he has it in for us.
Is there one single program that he began that hasn’t ended up costing the taxpayers billions and billions of dollars??
What is truly shocking is that he still has his legion of faithful Stepford lemmings. Or that those lemmings still attribute all of Ontario’s financial woes to Mike Harris. Pretty scary.
This article is clear and well-written. It is also full of painful truths. Dalton McGuinty is looking very tired these days. Let’s wish him a long – very long – rest in his imminent absence from public life. And then let’s breathe a sigh of relief.