Comment
Few imagined
It may be the most important election in Prince Edward County since 1998. Strains are pulling at the fabric of this place. The centre is fraying. It may struggle to hold together.
With each passing decade, it becomes harder to see our prospects, opportunities, and community ambitions through the lens of local government. More and more we live our lives with little regard for Shire Hall— less a shining light on a hill, more an industrial- scale vacuum of energy, time and resources. More irritant than inspiration. Neither a comfort nor a curse.
The institution is fading. Seemingly unable to protect or promote. Shrugging toward irrelevance. It is vulnerable. It needs our attention.
A decade was lost chasing the agenda of developers and the province—even as the province was shrinking from its responsibilities and developers jockeyed for advantage. Meanwhile, the engine that drove investment, energy, and the creative rural economy a decade ago is stalling out as the first wave of grapegrowers and winemakers begins aging out. Some are disappearing with barely a ripple.
As land prices soar and regulatory hurdles expand, Prince Edward County suddenly looks less appealing to investors, entrepreneurs, and those who might otherwise have considered making a life here. Barley days are giving way to a buckthorn thicket. We are drifting to the mean of generic rural Ontario.
We might wish our local government had a plan to restore the vitality and dynamism of the County economy that hummed during the first decade of the millennium—that made waves across Canada and beyond. We might expect it to nudge the economy out of its drifting trajectory. But to do so imagines that Shire Hall considers the local economy at all. There is little evidence to suggest it does.
Council decided in 2010 the local economy wasn’t necessary. Some resented the money spent to nurture and cultivate the investment that the efforts attracted. Others simply didn’t like the face of economic development—despite the success created. Even as the brand continued to draw investment two decades later.
Some argued cultivation wasn’t necessary— once the creative rural economy was rolling, it would keep thriving. It would always do so. In perpetuity without reinvestment. Some still do.
Few imagined other communities would innovate, invest in their opportunities and would one day compete with Prince Edward County. Few imagined.
The same arguments are currently being tested regarding tourism. Unsatisfied with the fresh flow of tax revenue from the accommodation tax, some want a bigger share of it. The province created the tax to shift the cost of tourism promotion onto municipalities—half going to the municipality to manage visitors, half to destination marketing orgs to promote their competitive advantage.
But some folks want it all—they don’t want to share. The tourism economy can look after itself.
So they cajole Queen’s Park. Someday the province will concede. Local government will steal away all the tax and throw it into roads it can’t afford to maintain. To roads it no longer remembers were the province’s responsibility.
The outcome is as predictable as gravity. Investment will go to more fertile ground. The tourism sector will wither. The revenue pool will dry up. Barely noticeable at first. By then it will be too late.
While the natural beauty of Prince Edward County will likely continue to draw holidaygoers for a long time, without innovation, investment, and entrepreneurialism in the shoulder seasons, it can’t hope to feed more than seasonal workers.
A young council candidate in Athol proclaimed last week that “the County was her home, not a business opportunity”. It was surely intended as a snappy contrast line—and a good one. Yet it captures a lot.
But here is the thing: It is unclear how the County remains the County without investment. Without entrepreneurs chasing business opportunities. Without a vital brand. Without a creative rural economy.
Can we eat the County?
Find a candidate meeting near you (See page 15). Help with the nudging.
And keep firmly in mind: Legal Expenses spent by the County are spent with YOUR MONEY.
A municipality does not have to spend extra money to defend itself at the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). But how much they spend depends on how they choose to handle the argument.
Here is how a municipality can defend itself without spending extra money:
• Using workers they already pay: Big towns already have their own lawyers and city planners on staff. Since these workers get paid a regular salary, the town doesn’t have to pay extra hourly fees to fight the case.
• Making a deal: The town can talk to the builder and make a compromise. This stops the fight early before it gets expensive.
• Making the builder pay: Sometimes, before a project even starts, the town makes the builder sign a contract promising to pay for the town’s legal bills if a fight happens.
• Giving up: The town can simply decide not to fight the builder, which costs nothing.
One Big Risk to Remember
======================
Even though the municipality doesn’t have to spend money, they have to be careful.
If the municipality goes to the tribunal and acts unfair, wastes everyone’s time, or fights for a silly reason, the tribunal can punish them.
The tribunal can force the municipality to pay for the builder’s legal bills, which can cost a lot of money.
BUT
===
If the municipality simply cannot afford to spend the money the developer wants them to spend, that is neither unreasonable or unfair, and certainly an objective third party would not deem this “silly”.
Rather, it is arguably all of those things for anyone to expect a municipality to spend money it does not have.
The CAO and the Director of Finance should be more than capable of making these arguments at any OLT proceeding, backed up by clear evidence. A lawyer is NOT a requirement.
If either or both of these Staff refuse to at least try this as a first step, then they should be replaced. The Mayor has the ability to do this, as the CAO is an employee of the municipality and the Director of Finance reports to the CAO.
Punting things to lawyers instead of using common sense and plain English is unacceptable.
ADVANCE VOTING BEGINS TOMORROW. Make your vote count!
The County is on a track to go broke. The Province really needs to step in and take control. Too many staff, too many vehicles, to many Regional Water Dreams. No in house experience to manage projects on budget! The Ministry of Municipal Affairs taking over would be a positive.
Somebody else had mentioned a public inquiry to get to the bottom of what has occurred at shire hall? Would that help?
@susan — This has been an idea mentioned by others in comments on this site and others.
Unfortunately, despite the rather dire condition of finances as indicated by the Audited Financial Statements presented to the Audit Committee’s Aug 13 meeting by KPMG, the external auditors, before stepping in to seize control, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing would require the county to exhaust all structural tools, including at least the following:
1) forcing higher utility/water rate hikes,
2) divesting (selling off) non-essential municipal lands to build up operating reserves, and
3) curbing capital projects.
The evidence is impossible to refute.
Our net debt jumped by 47% in a single year to over $80 million, driven largely by expensive infrastructure projects like water and wastewater upgrades.
Furthermore, while the County holds roughly $35 million in reserves, that money is legally locked away for future development projects. It cannot be used as an emergency savings account to pay down our current debt or run the town.
A provincial takeover would mean losing local control over our community’s future, as unelected provincial officials would make these harsh adjustments for us.
The Province’s role right now is to monitor our Council to ensure they balance the operational budget, as running a operational deficit is illegal for any town in Ontario.
The most effective way to protect our community is to demand strict spending caps and project deferrals during upcoming budget sessions.
And, of course, VOTE for a new Mayor that will commit to targeting annual property tax increases to no more than the annual CPP pension increase as prescribed by the Federal government each November.
Vote for a new Mayor that will instruct Staff to draft a budget that does the needed things, before we actually do lose control and the Province does have to step in.
I would like to see a Mayor come in who has absolutely NO reason to declare a Conflict of Interest. None.
That is one vote the entire population of 26,000+/- that the County loses. That is also the ONLY VOTE in our Council that is allowed to break a tie vote. If the Mayor declares a Conflict of Interest, he cannot break a tie vote either. Keep that in mind.
The Loyalist Heights subdivision is a case in point, and no matter how good he is, one of our candidates for Mayor is unable to protect the Warings Creek Headwaters [or the WCIA 30 years of effort] and keep it intact – from the subdivisions on either side of the Creek. The present term of Council caved when one of the developers threatened to go to the Ontario Land Tribunal during this term of Council. The funds for our municipal government to pay for an OLT case comes out of the Planning and Department budget which also funds other legal items within that department.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From an Action Request:
$110,000 budgeted in legal services for the Planning Department in 2026. $11,378.50 was spent to the end of May 2026 leaving $98,621.50 remaining. As noted, this amount is for all legal services related to planning.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have requested a detailed breakdown of how this money was spent, but do not anticipate a response until after the election. I have requested the result to reflect any additional expenditures on this budget up to, and including, the date the response is given to me.
Note:
Bearing in mind that the [30 year volunteers] Warings Creek Improvement Association is, for the second time, asking for donations from the public toward their own OLT legal fund up to $100,000, ask yourself how far the money in the Planning Department would go to file a tribunal to protect the interests of the residents – on ANY Ontario Land Tribunal case in the County.
ASK A LOT OF QUESTIONS OF THE CANDIDATES.
AND THEN VOTE!