County News

Upside down

Posted: Jul 6, 2026 at 10:22 am   /   by   /   comments (1)

Existing water users will pay

Shire Hall staff acknowledged on Thursday that a one per cent growth rate means a much larger share of the proposed infrastructure spending (regional plant and intake in Wellington and a 20-kilometre pipeline to Picton) will be borne by existing water rate payers across Prince Edward County.

The notion of “growth paying for growth” has disappeared from the Shire Hall planning conversation. Its power as a marketing slogan was persuasive for a time, but it has withered in the light of day.

When folks imagined a surge of new homebuilding and rapid population growth in Prince Edward County just a couple of years ago, their chief argument was that development would pay the bulk (78 per cent) of the cost. Now that those lofty forecasts have come back to earth, the script has changed.

Instead, it is now clear that existing water customers across Prince Edward County will have to foot the overwhelming share of the bill—not developers.

“We’ve heard for years that growth pays for growth,” said Councillor Corey Engelsdorfer in the committee meeting on Thursday. “But according to this report, 75 per cent of the costs are paid for by existing users. It doesn’t look like growth is paying for growth.”

Cristal Laanstra, head of development services, suggested that the shift of costs to existing users was due to Picton residents benefitting from a new plant in Wellington. That is clearly incorrect in the context of the councillor’s question. Picton residents were always getting this benefit—under the old and new plans.

The difference is entirely about growth rates. Lower growth means existing users must fund a much higher proportion of the hundreds of millions of dollars in spending.

The dream of wildly surging growth rates was always about the opportunity to shift more of the cost onto development. This opportunity proved a mirage.

It will be existing users who pay.

Comments (1)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • Jul 6, 2026 at 2:26 pm Hopeful

    Growth was a mirage, based on consultant- and developer-prepared spreadsheets, ignoring the realities of the County that limit the extent to which the County is capable of growing.

    And “growth pays for growth” was a convenient slogan used by the pro-developer section of Council that similarly ignored those realities.

    We (all of us) in the County should be making decisions based on hard evidence. The 2026 Census data will be available from Stats Canada in early 2027. And that data should be used to sanity-check all the assumptions, and right-size the spending, debt, expenses and property taxes.

    With just 3 months left until the election, and at least a month, possibly two, before the Audited Financials for the year ended Dec 31, 2025 are available for public view, it would be completely irresponsible for the existing Mayor and Council to make any decisions involving any spending other than currently committed.

    Reply